Disfunción eréctil y YouTube: calidad de los vídeos en español / Erectile dysfunction and YouTube: Quality of videos in Spanish

Introducción: La disfunción eréctil (DE) es una de las enfermedades urológicas más prevalentes, pero los datos de la calidad de su información en redes sociales son escasos. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la calidad de la información sobre DE contenida en los vídeos de YouTube. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal de los 50 primeros vídeos en castellano publicados en YouTube, evaluados por tres urólogos mediante dos cuestionarios validados: Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) y DISCERN, clasificándolos según puntuación DISCERN en calidad pobre y moderada-buena. Resultados: La mediana de duración fue de 2,42 minutos, y la de visualizaciones, de 94.197 (2.313-3.027.890), con 682,5 (0-54.020) «me gusta» y 39 (0-2.843) «no me gusta». La mediana de PEMAT fue del 29% en inteligibilidad y del 29% en factibilidad. Con DISCERN, 27 vídeos (57,4%) fueron de calidad pobre y 20 (42,6%), de calidad moderada-buena. No observamos diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en duración, visualizaciones, número de «me gusta» o de «no me gusta». Sí existieron diferencias en PEMAT de inteligibilidad y de factibilidad. El 86,7% de los protagonizados por personal médico fueron de calidad moderada-buena (p=0,001). El 85,7% de los que describían el tratamiento fueron de calidad moderada-buena y el 84% de los vídeos no médicos fueron de calidad pobre (p=0,001). Conclusiones: La mayoría de los vídeos sobre DE en YouTube son de calidad pobre. Los vídeos de mayor calidad son aquellos realizados por profesionales, aunque no son los más vistos. Sería importante el desarrollo de medidas para evitar la difusión de desinformación entre los usuarios de redes sociales. (AU)

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most prevalent urological diseases, but there is limited data about the quality of its information in social networks. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of ED information contained in YouTube videos. Material and methods: Descriptive study of the first 50 Spanish-language videos, published on YouTube, evaluated by three urologists. We used two validated questionnaires: PEMAT (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool) and DISCERN. Videos were classified according to DISCERN score into poor or moderate-good quality. Results: The median time duration was 2.42minutes (0.15-3.58), 94,197 views (2,313-3,027,890), 682.5 «likes» (0-54,020) and 39 «dislikes» (0-2843). The median of PEMAT score was 29% (9%-95.5%) in understandability and 29% (0-95.5%) in actionability. According to DISCERN score 27 videos (57.4%) had poor quality and 20 (42.6%) moderate-good quality. There were no significant differences between the two groups in time duration, views, «likes» or «dislikes». There were differences in PEMAT score in understandability and actionability. The 86.7% of the moderate-good quality videos were starred by health care provider (P=.001). Also, the 85.7% of videos that describes treatment had moderate-good quality (P=.001). The 84% of the non-medical videos had a poor quality (P=.001). Conclusion: Most ED videos on YouTube have poor quality. The highest quality videos are those made by professionals, although they are not the most viewed. It would be important to develop measures to prevent the spread of misinformation among social network users. (AU)

[Erectile dysfunction and YouTube: Quality of videos in Spanish]. / Disfunción eréctil y YouTube: calidad de los vídeos en español.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most prevalent urological diseases, but there is limited data about the quality of its information in social networks. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of ED information contained in YouTube videos. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study of the first 50 Spanish-language videos, published on YouTube, evaluated by three urologists. We used two validated questionnaires: PEMAT (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool) and DISCERN. Videos were classified according to DISCERN score into poor or moderate-good quality. RESULTS: The median time duration was 2.42minutes (0.15-3.58), 94,197 views (2,313-3,027,890), 682.5 «likes¼ (0-54,020) and 39 «dislikes¼ (0-2843). The median of PEMAT score was 29% (9%-95.5%) in understandability and 29% (0-95.5%) in actionability. According to DISCERN score 27 videos (57.4%) had poor quality and 20 (42.6%) moderate-good quality. There were no significant differences between the two groups in time duration, views, «likes¼ or «dislikes¼. There were differences in PEMAT score in understandability and actionability. The 86.7% of the moderate-good quality videos were starred by health care provider (P=.001). Also, the 85.7% of videos that describes treatment had moderate-good quality (P=.001). The 84% of the non-medical videos had a poor quality (P=.001). CONCLUSION: Most ED videos on YouTube have poor quality. The highest quality videos are those made by professionals, although they are not the most viewed. It would be important to develop measures to prevent the spread of misinformation among social network users.

[Current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.] / Estado actual de la Colposacropexia Laparoscópica (CSPL) en la corrección del Prolapso de Órganos Pélvicos (POP).

OBJECTIVES: Surgical restoration of pelvic floor anatomy in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should avoid extensive areas that may injure healthy tissues and lead to scar fibrosis producing dysfunctional rigidity. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy corrects POP by lifting pelvic elements with a minimally invasive procedure.Various current strategies and approaches make it a diverse procedure. METHODS: We performed a bibliographic review on the published experience about abdominal sacrocolpopexy over the last 20 years. We analyze the philosophy of each technique, advantages, disadvantages, and results. RESULTS: Among current theories that explain how is the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor, the comprehensive theory of the pelvic floor announces that anatomical deviation produces pelvic dysfunction (diagnostic algorithm)(1). Surgical invasion with reconstructive purposes may hide results if the true physiopathology of the defects found is not known. Although current diagnostic tools cannot solve the problem as a whole, results of different techniques are much better than those of previous times. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is an adequate strategy that restores anatomy in POP, mainly apical, and function with minimal invasion. Technical development and better knowledge of the female pelvis functional anatomy is enabling today a more precise understanding of its physiopathology, so it facilitates the design of site-specific operations. Various surgical approaches and techniques are offered depending on the defect, where combined procedures give good solutions. It is necessary to have an appropriate surgical training to obtain the better competence, and a safe and correct repair.

Estado actual de la Colposacropexia Laparoscópica (CSPL) en la corrección del Prolapso de Órganos Pélvicos (POP) / Current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

OBJETIVO: La restauración quirúrgica de la anatomía del suelo pélvico en el POP (Prolapso Órganos Pélvicos) debe evitar la disección de extensas áreas, que lesionan tejidos sanos y la fibrosis cicatricial que produce rigidez no funcionante. La colposacropexia laparoscópica (CSPL) corrige el POP al suspender los elementos pélvicos descendidos con mínima invasión (CMI). Distintas estrategias y abordajes actuales hacen que sea un procedimiento diverso. MÉTODOS: Se realiza revisión bibliográfica de la experiencia publicada sobre colposacropexia abdominal (CSPA) en los últimos 20 años. Se analiza la filosofía de cada técnica, ventajas, inconvenientes, y resultados. RESULTADOS: Dentro de las teorías actuales que explican cómo es la anatomía y la funcionalidad del suelo pélvico la Teoría Integral del Piso Pélvico (TSI) anuncia que la desviación anatómica produce disfunción pélvica (algoritmo diagnóstico) (1). La intrusión quirúrgica con fines reparadores puede enmascarar los resultados si no se conoce la verdadera fisiopatología de los defectos encontrados. Si bien las herramientas actuales de diagnóstico no logran resolver la problemática en su totalidad, los resultados de las diferentes técnicas hoy son mucho mejores que abordajes de épocas anteriores. CONCLUSIONES: La CSPL es una adecuada estrategia que consigue restaurar la anatomía del POP, principalmente apical, restaurando la función con invasión mínima. El desarrollo técnico y el mejor conocimiento de la anatomía funcional de la pelvis femenina esta hoy permitiendo comprender con mayor precisión su fisiopatología lo que facilita diseñar el tipo de cirugía sitio-específica. Se ofertan vías de abordajes y técnicas diferentes según el defecto, donde los procedimientos combinados ofrecen buenas soluciones. Es preciso un entrenamiento quirúrgico apropiado para obtener la mejor competencia, y una correcta y segura reparación

OBJECTIVES: Surgical restoration of pelvic floor anatomy in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should avoid extensive areas that may injure healthy tissues and lead to scar fibrosis producing dysfunctional rigidity. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy corrects POP by lifting pelvic elements with a minimally invasive procedure Various current strategies and approaches make it a diverse procedure. METHODS: We performed a bibliographic review on the published experience about abdominal sacrocolpopexy over the last 20 years. We analyze the philosophy of each technique, advantages, disadvantages, and results. RESULTS: Among current theories that explain how is the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor, the comprehensive theory of the pelvic floor announces that anatomical deviation produces pelvic dysfunction (diagnostic algorithm)(1). Surgical invasion with reconstructive purposes may hide results if the true physiopathology of the defects found is not known. Although current diagnostic tools cannot solve the problem as a whole, results of different techniques are much better than those of previous times. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is an adequate strategy that restores anatomy in POP, mainly apical, and function with minimal invasion. Technical development and better knowledge of the female pelvis functional anatomy is enabling today a more precise understanding of its physiopathology, so it facilitates the design of site-specific operations. Various surgical approaches and techniques are offered depending on the defect, where combined procedures give good solutions. It is necessary to have an appropriate surgical training to obtain the better competence, and a safe and correct repair